Tools of Change: the Front of Store New York presentation
Posted: February 16, 2012 Filed under: Digital life | Tags: Amazon, Bookselling, Ebooks, High streets, New York, O'Reilly, Online retail, Shopping centres, Tools of Change, Town planning 3 Comments »
I’m just back from New York, and the very stimulating, content-packed Tools of Change conference hosted by O’Reilly Media. On Tuesday morning I gave a short talk on a couple of my current thoughts.
Regular readers of the Front of Store blog will be familiar with some of this, but (a) we’re bringing on new readers all the time, and (b) there’s new stuff here, as well as new thoughts on older stuff.
Marriott organisation scored a little less than 10/10 for our session, so our panel had to canter through their presentations with minimal time for questions. So this post consists of my presentation, fleshed out and extrapolated, with slides where appropriate. Here we go, with a cheerful message that echoes much post-Portas thinking, including Justin King’s speech last night.
First up, it was important to remind a “book world” audience that, although the book sector is undergoing revolutionary change at the moment, all retail categories and locations are being affected by consumers switching from physical stores to online shopping. As I noted, the growth in online selling is changing the entire complexion of the retail industry – not just bookselling. Whole swathes of real estate will become redundant. And in the UK, we are leading the world in online retail penetration.
Around 60% of all adults shop online in the UK and, as this blog noted last month, approaching 10% of all UK retail spending is now online, including about 7% of all food and groceries. Bain’s comparison between Britain and other developed countries underlines how far ahead we are in the UK; in United States, France, Germany, Sweden, only about 30% of adults are shopping online. Of course, China is joining the race from a standing start, and will quickly build their online share.
Again, these statistics and projections have already made one appearance at Front of Store, but they serve to emphasise that sales in many UK retail categories have already been hugely diminished by eCommerce. As far as books are concerned, Amazon and the supermarkets sell around 50% of all printed books, but of course total unit sales of pBooks, whatever the channel, are now being diminished again by the Kindle.
The most vigorous illustration of the impact of channel shifting came from Tesco, the UK’s biggest supermarket chain, where CEO Phil Clarke has indicated that Tesco will be shrinking future store sizes, and reducing their instore non-food commitment.
So, in terms of book sales, it isn’t just these guys who are getting hammered by the internet:
It’s these guys too:
This is a pretty quick shift for supermarkets, from “voracious baddie” to “another victim”, but it has fundamental ramifications for publishers. Supermarkets account for around 20% of all UK book sales. Sales of physical books will fall in supermarkets, so the commitment of Tesco and its competitors to books will be reduced appropriately.
Given the pace of growth in ebook readership – and the crossover between the most effective ebook content (narrative works, eg fiction, biography etc), and supermarkets’ key adult categories (narrative works), supermarket to books will be reduced. The impact of this on the publishing industry will be more fundamental than the loss of a specialist chain. The supermarkets sell the mass-market stuff that pays for the literary stuff. Are publishers planning appropriately for this very significant shift?
However, physical retail still matters, and will continue to matter even as the number of specialist booksellers falls, and the commitment of the supermarkets wanes. A considerable number of consumers will still want to buy print books from physical stores – and, by-the-bye, I’m going to guess that the average publishing conglomerate would prefer a situation where orphan sales didn’t automatically default to Amazon.
A couple of weeks ago, I sat on the judging panel for a book marketing award. Despite these major channel changes, only one of the entries, out of a field of about 30, placed its physical books anywhere other than in traditional outlets – bookshops, supermarkets and the like. Publishers must consider alternative retail channel strategies.
Here’s why:
There will still be bookshops in the future. But the democratisation of reading and access is going into reverse (at the same time as the library sector is under fundamental threat).
In the future, great little bookstores will serve communities of real book lovers – educated, affluent, intellectual people. They’ll run events, sell online and offer click-and-collect, home delivery and all sorts of customer-first offers. They’ll support their sales of books with gifts, toys, stationery and coffee, catering to a wide area… they’ll be just like little superstores. Critically, they must be integrated into the ebook food-chain, because the recommendation of a good bookseller cannot be replicated through any online “search-and-browse” mechanic.
Deliberately provocative, I noted that there’ll be plenty of these bookstores in the sort of places that people like me and the conference delegates live and work – London, Oxford or Edinburgh, New York, Boston or San Francisco.
But the economics won’t work in smaller, poorer or less well-educated communities. I don’t believe - and I’m not sure if anyone believes it – that there will be room in the near future for 300 Waterstones or 700 Barnes & Noble stores. The two-century long surge in long-form book reading driven by 19th century serialisation and rail travel, and by 20th century drug stores, book clubs, mall stores, superstores, air travel and fancy vacations, is coming to an end.
But we’re also seeing the first signs of Ebook sales flattening, as new technology diminishes the importance and visibility of the book, and provides device users with many viable alternatives to books. School kids and commuters aren’t carrying paperbacks like they used to – they’re playing games on their iPhones.
We – the whole of the book trade, not just Amazon – needs to format and sell books and content, to maintain pertinence for the mass-market. This isn’t about existing heavy readers transferring to eReaders, as most of those interested in the US and UK have already made the switch. Instead, it’s about the next generation of uncommitted potential readers.
Long-form reading isn’t going to die, bookshops won’t disappear, and great writing will persist. But there’s a risk that the audience for all of these things will diminish significantly – and, as I noted above, the withdrawal of physical books from everyday retail locations will cause a large proportion of the customer base simply to stop buying books.
We saw this when Borders closed in the UK – around half of Borders’ total sales just disappeared from the market, instead of transferring to other retailers – and this was nine months before the Kindle arrived in Britain. So while people living in nice places will still have great bookshops, the places in between won’t be as well served. The industry will then have to persuade people to start reading long-form again, buying physical books or content online. Whatever the format, it’s a fundamental challenge for the industry.
Thus far, I’ve just been discussing the big English language markets. However, change is afoot in continental Europe.
I’ve just described scenarios in Britain and America. But suddenly, the protected European markets are looking vulnerable. Countries like Germany, France and Spain have significant market and cultural controls in place, which have ensured historically that printed books are sold at the same price (or, in France, with no more than a 5% dicount) – the publisher’s RRP – whatever the outlet. Specialist bookshops, supermarkets, Amazon have all had to abide by the law.
In the past few months, everything has changed. Kindle and Kobo have started to take off in these key territories, and of course – as Rudiger Wischenbart demonstrated at TOC in Frankfurt – the selling prices (the RRP) of ebooks can be 20%, 30%, 40% lower than pBooks in those territories. This means that consumers in France, Germany and elsewhere are seeing seriously discounted book prices for the first time ever.
No amount of cultural legislation can create price parity between very different formats.
The Fnac expansion story and the stability of Thalia in Germany both start to look suspect in the new market conditions, where economic squeeze and technological change look as though they will finally upset those stable, mature European markets. Managing massive change – which was recently an operational problem only in English-speaking territories – has rapidly gone global.
To conclude, we can see what is happening, but we don’t understand how the consumer market for books will settle; I believe that publishers need to be driving that future much more pro-actively. As my final slide notes:
So, there are a lot of unknowns, and a great deal to think about, to plan and deliver. I very much hope – indeed, I’m pretty certain – that among the Tools of Change delegates were those who can and will fashion the future, rather than being buffeted by economics, technology and Our Friends In Seattle. This market is big enough for more than one player, so whether you’re a legacy player or a new start-up, you need to make yourselves some good luck, and create a future publishing/bookselling industry that you want.
* * * * * * *
My eBook, A Year at Front of Store, is available in all Amazon Kindle territories – United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy and Spain.
Amazon shock: on the same planet as everyone else
Posted: February 6, 2012 Filed under: Online retailing | Tags: Amazon, Bookselling, Christmas 2011, Ebooks, Online retail 2 Comments »The analysts have jumped all over Amazon, following the release of a set of fourth quarter and full year results that demonstrated that no company walks on water (well, not indefinitely). In part, Amazon have brought this upon themselves; they failed to live up to their guidance, having not learnt the “under-promise, over-deliver” rule that Apple always applies to its relationships with the investment community.
Jeff Bezos has reminded us that he wants to be a high sales, low margin company, rather than vice versa. It’s well understood that Amazon is investing in distributing barely profitable Kindle hardware in order to secure future content sales worth many multiples of the original investment. But that spectacular P/E ratio has come under some pressure – the Publishers Weekly account of the investors’ call is worth a look.
When I’m looking at financial statements, I always start with the obvious operational numbers, and these certainly suggest a flattening in Amazon’s growth trajectory:
North America:
Sales uplift, Q4:
2011 vs 2010: +37%
Sales uplift, full year:
2011 vs 2010: +43%
This does feel like a reversal, in that one would expect all of the hard work from the full year to deliver extra benefits at Christmas, and that those much discussed Kindle Fires would have made a material difference to sales in Q4.
Unfortunately, operating expenses are up, so margins have tightened.
Operating expenses, Q4:
2011: 97.1% of sales
2010: 95.9%
Operating expenses, full year:
2011: 96.5% of sales
2010: 94.9%
Operating income, Q4:
2011: 2.9% of sales
2010: 4.1%
Operating income, full year:
2011: 3.5% of sales
2010: 5.1%
What is a little unusual about these numbers is that they fly counter to normal retail practice.
If I’m running a bricks and mortar shop, my occupancy costs in the fourth quarter are largely unchanged – perhaps a little more heat and light than in the summer, but rent and taxes are stable. My staffing costs are higher, but not proportionately – retail staff are much more productive in the Q4 than through the rest of the year. So, although my gross margins may be subject to competitive pressure, my costbase shrinks hugely as a percentage of sales.
This is why traditional retailers refer to Q4 as the “golden quarter” – it’s when they deliver the lion’s share of their annual profitability, and run with the highest efficiency. In a bookstore, I might see my pay-to-sales ratio drop from 11% in June to 6% in December. This is because hitting the cash registers is a small part of the total work done instore, and other activities - receiving goods, merchandising, interacting with customers – deliver much higher returns in December.
However, I guess it’s different online. I have no doubt that Amazon runs some of the most sophisticated warehousing in the world, but I’m going to guess that higher transaction volumes lead to higher payroll cost – there are fractional gains from selling large quantities of a small number of titles, but the manual processing required won’t diminish exponentially, as it does in a physical shop.
The other possibility that these numbers suggest is that Amazon discounts even more furiously in Q4 than it does through the rest of the year, in pursuit of always providing the very best value for its customers. Given that Amazon is so often the price leader in its category, you do wonder if some of that discounting is being sliced just a little too thinly for Amazon’s own good?
Now, these are simple, bricks vs clicks parallels – and the opacity of Amazon’s reporting inevitably leads to much speculation. There are plenty of questions specific to the Amazon model for investors to ask – is Prime costing more than it’s delivering; when will Amazon reap the dividend of selling Kindles at around cost, etc.
All of the above applies to Amazon’s “mature” market, North America, where sales are up by “only” 37%. The rest of the world is lumped under the heading of “International”; new territories are being opened up, and new products and categories launched.
International:
Sales uplift, Q4:
2011 vs 2010: +31%
Sales uplift, full year:
2011 vs 2010: +38%
Away from North America, growth is significantly lower than it is at home (and exchange rate shifts mean that like-for-like growth is overstated here). This may reflect the very sluggish/recessionary European economies – America is starting to see a recovery that Europe is still waiting for. Of course, Q4 growth of 31% (29% currency-corrected) still compares pretty favourably to, say, the BRC’s +2.2% UK like-for-like sales in December, or CapGemini’s +16.5% like-for-likes for online retailers in the UK over the same period.
But it all comes at a cost:
Operating expenses, Q4:
2011: 97.6% of sales
2010: 94.3%
Operating expenses, full year:
2011: 97.0% of sales
2010: 93.7%
Operating income, Q4:
2011: 2.4% of sales
2010: 5.7%
Operating income, full year:
2011: 3.0% of sales
2010: 6.3%
In mature retailers, when margins halve, alarm bells ring. There might be one-off costs, of course – launching new products; or one-off crises – warehouse meltdown being a favourite. However, there’s no suggestion from Amazon that they’re anything but happy with these results, and they’ve weathered worse. Still, that economies of scale question is an interesting one to ponder…
Photo ©Les Wilson
The new Canada Water Library at Rotherhithe
Posted: February 3, 2012 Filed under: Libraries | Tags: Libraries, London, Rotherhithe, Southwark, Town planning Comments OffI spent some of my formative years in Rotherhithe, SE16, and returned there a couple of weeks ago to explore its splendid new library. Big thanks to Pam Usher, Southwark Council’s Library Service Manager, for her hospitality – I’ve written about my visit in this piece in The Bookseller.
Plenty of good photos (interiors and exteriors) at this blogsite.
Front of Store – the e-book!
Posted: January 30, 2012 Filed under: General retail, This blog | Tags: Waterstone's, HMV, Amazon, Mary Portas, Kindle, Borders, Ebooks, Tesco, Westfield, Front of Store Comments OffI started writing the Front of Store blog a year ago, as a response to British retailers’ 2010 Christmas trading numbers. A year later, a new set of results has been published, another Christmas has been put to bed, and it feels like a sensible time to take stock.
When I created the first entry, I couldn’t be certain what directions my blog would take – I knew I had plenty to say, both about my “home” trade of bookselling, and about the broader world of retail. And the news stories kept on coming throughout the year – Borders, HMV, Waterstone’s, and more recently Westfield, Tesco and Mary Portas. Underpinning the bricks and mortar triumphs and travails is the real unavoidable success story of modern retailing – online commerce, digitisation and Amazon.
Ah yes, Amazon. An inescapable part of everyone’s life now, bringing good things (service and value) to the consumer, while driving a coach-and-horses through established practices in every sector it touches. Like Apple, Amazon anticipates the future, leaving its competitors to react to its initiatives. Too often, Amazon’s competitors try to protect their heritage, where instead they should be repurposing their companies for the future.
There came a point last autumn when I looked at the total word count and thought, blimey, I’ve got a book here. Hence a Front of Store e-book – and, of course, I’m selling it through Kindle Direct Publishing. Industry estimates suggest that around 1.3m e-readers were bought in the UK over the Christmas period, and of that number, 1.2m were Kindles.
It would therefore be profoundly foolish to début anywhere other than on Kindle. Naturally, if I have a smash hit on my hands, I’ll make use of other formats – but the effort required to make a Kindle book has been fairly demanding – many evenings of editing and formatting in, and swearing at, Microsoft Word.
The initially published result was below par, so today’s buyers are being offered the second edition; after KDP struggled to translate tables and jpegs into ebook format in the first version, I went back and substituted lists and descriptions. This probably says more about my book-creating abilities than it does Amazon’s – but it underlines the complexity of creating “real” books, and the relative ease of ebook publishing.
I was talking to a friend last week who spends much of her life on planes and trains, and who loves her Kindle – convenience, accessibility and readability all score high marks with her. However, she confessed that she struggled to remember what she’d read on the Kindle; by contrast, physical books have a tactile presence that imprints itself on your memory (and thereafter, they sit on your shelves, whispering “remember me?”).
“A Year at Front of Store” is journalism, news and comment as it happens. I’ve carried out some pretty vigorous editing – excising time-expired pieces, eliminating anything that required colour illustration (or indeed any pictures at all), improving syntax (a bit), and adding in summaries and afterwords in the appropriate places. I’ve also included pieces that were published elsewhere, and added the full text of my Frankfurt address from October.
What I haven’t done is to apply any Winston Smith editing, so I don’t foresee that Mamut will buy Waterstone’s in June, or that London will riot in August.
There are a number of themes that I’d like to explore for a book “proper”, which will require a shift from journalism to more considered writing. The retail industry continues to be the most fascinating business arena – fast-moving, unpredictable, unsafe, and undergoing its most fundamental changes since the birth of the supermarkets.
I’d like to give a big hurrah for WordPress, which allows the Front of Store blog to happen, and whose text is relatively easy to shunt into Word, and thence to KDP. The blog has created opportunities for the Front of Store consultancy, as well as opening up some fascinating opportunities to speak at conferences and to advise behind closed doors.
Finally, thanks for reading. Readership of Front of Store has been growing exponentially - January’s hit-rate is 30% higher than December, which was 48% higher than November – and so on. Here’s to an exciting, challenging, ever-changing 2012.
A Year at Front of Store is available in all Amazon Kindle territories – United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Treat yourself to a copy!
Русские идут на Пикадилли
Posted: January 28, 2012 Filed under: Bookshops | Tags: Alexander Mamut, Bookselling, James Daunt, London, Piccadilly, Russia, Waterstone's Comments OffWaterstones is opening a Russian language department at its Piccadilly flagship. Called Slova, a full range of 5,000 Russian fiction and non-fiction titles will be sold from the ground floor mezzanine. Russia is a society of great literature and voracious readers – and, of course, Waterstones now has a Russian owner. You can read more in this article from the Independent.
Foreign language books have always been a wallflower department in English language bookshops. Because English is the world’s lingua franca (joke), we’ve never had much patience with literature in other languages, however worldly and cosmopolitan we may be – and I’m talking about the US and Australia as well as Britain. (Of course, I’m describing the population at large – I know that London’s literary lions devour books in Portuguese and Polish at their Tuscan pool-sides each summer.)
But compare the yards of English language fiction in any Dutch, Swedish or even French bookshop, to the sad couple of shelves we offer, often under the heading “Untranslated Literature”. That’s “untranslated” as in “the job was unfinished”. Worse yet, our Untranslated Literature often turns out to the very obvious (Dumas, Simenon), or translated English (Harry Potter und der Stein der Weisen, El Codigo Da Vinci).
So, I salute the Mamut/Daunt initiative in Piccadilly, and very much hope that this is the start of something much bigger.
London, the World City, boasts a population drawn from every corner of the world. The global village covers every demographic as well, from the bright young sandwich makers at Pret (where most of the staff were born outside the UK) to the old and the mega-rich in Chelsea and Belgravia. Most of them shop and transact business in the West End – so perhaps Waterstones’ initiative could be just a starting point.
If we’re honest, the Piccadilly flagship can feel a little empty. Two floors are given over to cafes and entertaining, and the circulation space elsewhere is huge. The location has always been a little odd, in trade bookshop terms – Charing Cross Road or Bloomsbury feel appropriate, Oxford Street provides traffic, but Piccadilly…?
And now, suddenly, Piccadilly looks very well placed, however, if we recast it from being the biggest iteration of your standard Waterstones, to being a global bookshop, servicing a global clientele. A Russian department is just a start – what about publishing from India and China, from South America, from France and Germany. (And a dedicated Danish Crime section, of course.)
I’d be prepared to bet that sales densities would rise, and that Waterstones’ Piccadilly store could achieve new levels of world-wide fame. Of course, a full global shipping service, easy transactions in multiple currencies, and access to the world’s pBook databases and eBooks files would also be essential, as would international events (with accompanying PR) and global village catering. But I believe London could support a single, global book superstore – one that no longer defined itself not in terms of its UK customers.
Bookshops of the future, trading in a world where popular publishing is dominated by the eBook, will need to redefine themselves – typically by reference to their local communities. Piccadilly’s community is the world – so, how about it?
Photo: ACDC Lighting
Big Box Man: options for Tesco and Dixons
Posted: January 20, 2012 Filed under: General retail | Tags: Apple, Black, Currys, Dixons, Electricals, John Browett, John Lewis, Kindle, Knowhow, Online retail, PC World, Philip Clarke, Retail parks, Supermarkets, Tesco Comments OffThe festive season hangover – the publication of Christmas trading results – is almost completed. WH Smith will announce next week and, on past form, that is likely to be the end of it. Thereafter, we will have to wait for actual half-year and full-year reporting, so that we can understand the levels of discounting that were needed to deliver some of those better-than-expected like-for-likes.
Away from the real strugglers, two businesses caught my attention. The first was, of course, Tesco, whose -2.3% LFLs sat uncomfortably next to Sainsbury’s +2.1% and Morrisons +0.7%. CEO Philip Clarke has now been in post for well over a hundred days, but he is acknowledging that Tesco has to change. His comments, allied to the poor trading figures, caused a sharp fall in Tesco’s share price, but it’s very clear that action is under way.
I’ve written before about the grudging nature of the Tesco store experience (here), and the sense I always get that the best interests of the consumer have to be aligned with the best interests of Tesco, rather than the other way around. It looks as though Clarke understands this – the Big Price Drop was yesterday’s response to today’s problem, and achieved the double of being trumped by other supermarkets’ vouchers whilst alienating loyal Clubcard holders; Fresh & Easy is looking like a bullet that needs to be bitten.
And here’s what interested me most: in conversation with Retail Week’s Alex Lawson, Clarke said:
You can go on growing space but we probably won’t be growing very big hypermarket space any more. We have got a few hypermarkets coming but will be announcing more on the bias of stores in April.
In other words, less of this in future?
And rather more of this?
We’ve seen problems for big box operators, as a result of online competition, in specialist sectors – Comet, Best Buy, Borders, Virgin Megastore and many more. However, the suggestion that Non-Food isn’t pulling its weight at Tesco; that Non-Food is as vulnerable in Tesco to online competition and showrooming as it is in less diversified specialist retailers – well, that is quite a sea-change. With 10% of all retail spending in the UK now taking place online, it’s inevitable that Tesco will be suffering attrition from online-only retailers, but the strategic shift implied by Philip Clarke (presaging an announcement in April) could herald the biggest shift in the pattern of UK retailing since Woolworth failed. Perhaps it also paves the way for Tesco to save the high street…?!
However, I don’t buy the “big box dinosaur” argument, although – as the Tesco Extra picture above demonstrates - you can reach a point when the size of your store becomes oppressive, and just adds to the unwelcomeness that can be part of the Tesco experience.
But good big boxes will survive and thrive, both because retail parks work exceptionally well (particularly away from London) as the most cost-effective way of bringing a diverse retail offer to a scattered population, but also because the big box experience, when done well, can deliver results that the high street just can’t match.
And so to Dixons. It’s been a filthy Christmas in electricals, with Best Buy closing down and Comet getting worse and worse as Kesa takes time to sell, leaving Dixons looking relatively healthy with a -7.0% like-for-likes. Chief Executive John Browett has been concentrating on changing the way the stores look and – more importantly - the way the customer feels about his business. I think he’s on the road to success – I liked the “Black” store at Westfield, and I really liked the refurbished Currys/PCWorld retail park store I visited earlier this week.
Like the store in this photograph, a consolidated electricals offer is now available under one roof, and sensibly the consumer electronics - audio, visual and computing – are on the ground level, with white goods – washing machines and vacuum cleaners - on a mezzanine. This makes for a smaller and more efficient footprint, but it also enables Dixons to create an electronics offer that I think makes John Lewis look tired and off-pace.
John Lewis? Bow, bow ye upper middle classes! But where JLP presents a brown goods world of carefully delineated TVs, radios, hifi and computing, the new Dixons layout recognises that we don’t use devices in this way any more, and that the distinctions between various product lines are now blurred. Its layout and flow presents a more effective offer for the consumer, and invites them to enhance their home electronics more effectively than old-style competitors. Wireless sound systems and big screens are now computer adjuncts, not “hi-fi” and “television”, and Dixons gets it.
Their Knowhow sub-brand message is driven home with relentless effectiveness - we really do understand this stuff, it says. Much has been made of the culture changes within the business, recognising (at last) that an ill-informed hard sell in an intimidating environment just doesn’t work any more. The new stores are customer friendly with good graphics, plenty of explanation and demonstration items, and informed but unpushy service.
Dixons has a huge estate – over 600 stores of various ages and configurations – and it has much to do to bring them all into line with current best practice. I’m optimistic, though - I think they’ve really got something here. However – please – they’ve got to do something about branding. The new stores aren’t “two stores under one roof” – they offer an integrated selection of electricals for the kitchen and every other room in the house (and office). Currys was a dismal washing machine shop, with neglible brand heritage (and it’s a word that looks poor on fascias, sounds blah when you say it). PC World harks back to the glories of Windows 95, but it leads with Apple and Kindle - suddenly, “PC World” sounds about as on-brand as Radio Rentals. Time to can these hoary old brands, and return to the one with the best heritage in the sector:
Images: Wikipedia; The Guardian; Peterborough Today
The Top Eighty retail locations in Britain?
Posted: January 5, 2012 Filed under: General retail | Tags: High streets, John Lewis, Mary Portas, Next, Online retail, Retail parks, Shopping centres, Town planning 3 Comments »A consistent theme in retail analysis over the past 12 months has been that, whereas 5/10/20 years ago, a non-food chain required 200/300/500 stores to achieve national coverage, today only 50-80 might be needed.
I don’t think that any one person is the author of this insight (but I’ll credit them if I’m mistaken). The thinking is as follows:
We now have a network of modern city centres and regional malls across the UK. These provide up-to-date retail space, with the flexibility in size and height that modern retail chains seek. By way of comparison, here’s Westfield at White City:
…and here’s a typical mall from the 1980s (in this case, a roofed-over 1960s construction):
The best shopping centres are offering their customers more than ever before; the rest of the field is struggling to keep up. And a high proportion of the total population is now within 30 minutes drive-time of a first class mall or city centre.
The other motor of change is, of course, online shopping; as this blog far-from-exclusively confirmed last week, the UK leads the world in adopting online retail, with 9% of all sales (by value) going to internet sites rather than bricks-and-mortar stores.
Two of Britain’s strongest retailers, John Lewis and Next, announced their Christmas trading results yesterday, and they underline the trends above. JLP has had a soaraway Christmas, with its stores anchoring many of the “key 80″ locations. Total Partnership sales from physical stores are up by 9.3%, and online growth has roared away, up 27.9%. Next’s total sales were up by 3.1%, but this was a tale of two formats; stores were down -2.7%, and online was up +16.9%. John Lewis has fewer than 40 department stores; Next has around 500 shops.
Of course, different stores have different demographics. A high-fashion teen chain and a smart furniture business might both prosper with 50 stores nationwide, but their customers wouldn’t all be best served by the same locations.
Nevertheless, in the spirit of digging out a hornet’s nest and poking it with a sharp stick, I thought I’d define 80 primary British locations for 2012. I’ve grouped them by location type, which I’ll enlarge on as we go along:
All of these centres are well-established, and are pretty evenly distributed across the country. Metrocentre is the oldest, but their owners continue to invest to keep abreast of consumer and tenant requirements. With the exception of Merry Hill (now a Westfield), they all sit on motorway junctions, rather than in city centres, and attract customers from a wide geographical region. Typically these megamalls are close to a retail park, so that big-box sellers of furniture and DIY are also represented. (And I appreciate that Braehead and Silverburn are different malls in different parts of Glasgow, so I’m already making two count for one…)
Just a few years ago, central London’s shopping offer consisted of the West End and Knightsbridge, with the offer elsewhere pretty strictly local. Today, a 40 minute ride on the Central Line takes you from one vast Westfield to the other, and en route you pass through (or at least close by) four other huge, separate markets. The City has evolved from a few poky high street stores on Cheapside to a major retail offer stretching from One New Change to Fenchurch Street (with an appendage out at Canary Wharf), and stores have grown bigger and more numerous in Covent Garden and Knightsbridge/King’s Road. The West End – from Fitzrovia to St James’s – offers the finest concentration of shopping in the world, and it’s the world that now shops here; increasingly, London caters for a global rather than national catchment, as the old family shopping trips from the provinces to the West End are replaced by crowds of Chinese tourists with their newly enabled credit cards, leading the charge at the Selfridges sale.
England and the Octopus was the title of a book published a hundred years ago by Clough Williams-Ellis, in which he expressed his concern that London, the Great Maw, would consume the countryside around it, growing unstoppably. At the time, he was probably worried about the rural charms of Dollis Hill or Morden; today, London dominates the economic activity of everything in an eighty mile radius – commuting distance for the capital’s huge workforce.
Much (too much?) of the UK’s wealth is concentrated into this region, which extends from the outer suburbs (Brent Cross, Romford) to the great University cities and the coast. Many of these towns are smaller than, say, Huddersfield, and some are debatable – is Crawley more worthy than High Wycombe, Newbury or Basingstoke? Brent Cross is just too small for the Megamall list, and – with expansion repeatedly stalled – is no longer the thing of wonder it once was.
Travelling across the Octopus is often a challenge – only a stark fool would drive the eleven miles from Kingston and Croydon unless his life depended on it – so there are plenty of prosperous shopping hubs; this list only covers the larger and more obvious among them.
A slightly contentious list here, particularly as some of these towns are proper regional centres in their own right – Bath, Chester and York have been important for 2000 years. However, what all these towns have in common is high tourist spend, and enviable concentrations of local wealth. Indeed, it’s the history at Aquae Sulis, Deva and Eboracum that ensures the tourists keep coming.
Cornwall is a poor county, but a strong tourist destination – there are national fashion chains a-plenty in small towns like Newquay and St Ives. The same effect can be seen in pockets elsewhere in the UK – Aldeburgh in Suffolk boasts a Jack Wills, for instance.
This is perhaps the most obvious schedule. Almost all of the major cities of England, Scotland and Wales have seen huge, strategic redevelopment in their city centres to ensure that they retain their importance. Schemes like Liverpool One, Cardiff St David’s and Bristol’s Cabot Place have brought new vigour into previously moribund centres; there are still a handful of cities on this list where development has stalled, and there’s the Athens of the North, where the ongoing tram developments might have been specifically designed to keep consumers out. Nevertheless, these are great cities that can guarantee footfall and spending. (nb: if I’d included Ireland, Belfast (UK) and Dublin (RoI) would of course be on this list.)
“The Best of the Rest” is an ugly term, and it covers a broad sweep of locations, from affluent Solihull to struggling Stoke. It’s a list that could easily inflame local loyalties – I haven’t found room for Portsmouth, Taunton, Blackpool or Stirling, but in setting an arbitrary figure of 80, I had to call a halt somewhere. Some of these locations are significant population centres, but they aren’t generating growth, and their town centres are sorry echoes of their former selves. Doncaster is here in part because it was Mary Portas’s focus, but it also stands for many other post-industrial towns in Yorkshire, Lancashire and the West Midlands that have seen better times.
And that’s my 80. It won’t be the same as yours, and it certainly won’t be the same as any particular retail chain’s. This is a blog, it isn’t science. Before signing any lease, a good retailer will match careful demographic analysis against their own gut feeling and enterprise; they’ll be looking for the next right place to be, not a town that enjoyed its greatness in the 19th or 20th centuries. I’ve missed off the outlet parks (Bicester, Gun Wharf), and I’ve largely skipped over the retail parks in places like Broughton, Birstall and Kinnaird – huge destinations locally, but little known outside their catchments.
But – most importantly - getting reductive to 80 underlines the challenges facing the smaller towns. Let’s travel from Watford to Nottingham on the M1 – 110 miles, passing Milton Keynes and Leicester (shoo-ins for the list) and Northampton (very borderline), but omitting (deep breath) Hemel Hempstead, Luton, Dunstable, Bedford, Bletchley, Rugby, Wellingborough, Kettering, Market Harborough, Nuneaton, Loughborough, Burton… twelve towns among the hundreds that were once must-have locations for national retailers. They still have stores there, but now, increasingly, they’ll be looking at their leases and reconsidering their options.
Images: overseaspropertymall.com; superstock.co.uk
Retail in 2012: the holistic approach
Posted: January 4, 2012 Filed under: General retail, Online retailing | Tags: Grant Shapps, High streets, Mary Portas, Online retail, The economy Comments OffThis short piece was originally published earlier today by My Retail Media, in their “Insight” section. myretailmedia.com is a website dedicated to the Retail Sector, covering all the major retail categories, and offering finance news, videos, comment and insight. They also produce News at Nine, a free daily eNewsletter, and offer bespoke subscription services, aggregating retail news from over 4,000 sources, and tailored for individual subscribers.
As we enter 2012, we asked Philip Downer, the owner of retail consultancy Front of Store and former CEO of Borders UK to tell us where he thought the major trends and shifts for the year ahead would appear.
The retail industry enters 2012 in the throes of profound change driven by two factors:
- The continuing belt-tightening of Britain’s consumers, which will continue into the mid-decade, as cuts in government spending and the rebalancing of the global economy continue to change our working lives.
- Along with this, the channel shift from physical stores to online provision, in which the UK – according to Bain & Co – leads the world, with over 9 per cent of all retail transactions now taking place online. None of us can predict where or when retail behaviour will “settle” as technological change continues to accelerate.
Many established retailers found themselves in difficulties in December 2011, with profit warnings, administrations and rumours of collapse circulating across the industry. Here are some key pointers for 2012 – all equally applicable to major chains and to indies/start-ups:
First up, it’s no longer feasible for any retailer not to have an active online presence. And “active” doesn’t simply mean an online store; customers expect integrated online and instore browsing and purchasing. The rise of click-and-collect underlines this change.
Thanks to the power of web research, consumers are now often better informed than sales staff instore, both on product specification, price and value. Poorly trained or unmotivated sales staff are a greater liability in physical stores than ever – some retailers are recognising this, others still don’t “get it”.
What’s more it’s become a truism that a chain now only needs 50-80 stores to achieve national coverage – where 20 years ago they needed 300 or above. Understanding which centres or towns will be winners, and which are the also-rans, is going to be critical for retailers and for legislators. It’s telling that Grant Shapps, the new “Minister for Retail” – who has to deliver the Government’s response to the Portas report – is attached to Eric Pickles’ Communities and Local Government department, and not to the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. High street revival is, perhaps rightly, viewed as a whole-community strategy, rather than simply a commercial challenge. This should at least mean that a holistic approach is taken to the many good points that Mary Portas raised.
Finally, things will get worse before they get better – but as the structure of the retail industry undergoes a once-in-a-generation change, the opportunities for entrepreneurs and visionaries to create retail success stores for next decade is wide open.






































